HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L
HPRO.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) and HSEF.L (HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - HPRO.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while HSEF.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HPRO.L returned -0.95%/yr vs 7.53%/yr for HSEF.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HPRO.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HSEF.L.
Performance
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HPRO.L is traded in GBp, while HSEF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSEF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPRO.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than HSEF.L's 15.86% return.
HPRO.L
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
HSEF.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 15.86%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 39.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- —
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 5.03% | 0.35% | -1.94% | 1.11% | -18.31% | 24.70% | 5.85% |
HSEF.L HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 15.86% | 20.85% | 17.02% | -1.33% | -8.36% | 1.82% | 11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPRO.L and HSEF.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2020 | 0.35 |
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HPRO.L
HSEF.L
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HPRO.L
HSEF.L
Technology
HPRO.L
HSEF.L
Consumer Cyclical
HPRO.L
HSEF.L
Financial Services
HPRO.L
HSEF.L
Basic Materials
HPRO.L
-
HSEF.L
Communication Services
HPRO.L
-
HSEF.L
Consumer Defensive
HPRO.L
-
HSEF.L
Energy
HPRO.L
-
HSEF.L
Healthcare
HPRO.L
-
HSEF.L
Industrials
HPRO.L
-
HSEF.L
Utilities
HPRO.L
-
HSEF.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L — Risk / Return Rank
HPRO.L
HSEF.L
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPRO.L | HSEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.48 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 4.16 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 14.08 | -10.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPRO.L | HSEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 2.73 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.48 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.60 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPRO.L drawdown since its inception was -36.31%, which is greater than HSEF.L's maximum drawdown of -23.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPRO.L and HSEF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPRO.L | HSEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.31% | -23.33% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -9.67% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.45% | -15.36% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.68% | -19.36% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.56% | -1.18% | -14.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -9.31% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.86% | -0.03% |
Volatility
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) is 3.15%, while HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that HPRO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPRO.L | HSEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 5.46% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 11.64% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 14.77% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 15.64% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 15.72% | -0.12% |
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPRO.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than HSEF.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Dividend Comparison
HPRO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while HSEF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
HSEF.L HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPRO.L and HSEF.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSEF.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSEF.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRO.L.
HPRO.L is categorized as REIT, while HSEF.L is Emerging Markets Equities. HPRO.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while HSEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HPRO.L and 0.18% for HSEF.L.
Find the right allocation for HPRO.L and HSEF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer