PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HPRO.L is traded in GBp, while HSEF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSEF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPRO.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than HSEF.L's 15.86% return.


HPRO.L

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
5.03%
6M
4.88%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*
1.14%

HSEF.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
3.67%
YTD
15.86%
6M
16.20%
1Y
39.08%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HPRO.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF
5.03%0.35%-1.94%1.11%-18.31%24.70%5.85%
HSEF.L
HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
15.86%20.85%17.02%-1.33%-8.36%1.82%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HPRO.L and HSEF.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2020

0.35

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HPRO.L
HSEF.L

Real Estate

99.6%
0.6%

Technology

0.4%
40.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
9.2%

Financial Services

0.0%
21.2%

Basic Materials

-

9.3%

Communication Services

-

2.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Energy

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

4.0%

Industrials

-

4.8%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Real Estate

HPRO.L
99.6%
HSEF.L
0.6%

Technology

HPRO.L
0.4%
HSEF.L
40.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HPRO.L
0.0%
HSEF.L
9.2%

Financial Services

HPRO.L
0.0%
HSEF.L
21.2%

Basic Materials

HPRO.L

-

HSEF.L
9.3%

Communication Services

HPRO.L

-

HSEF.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

HPRO.L

-

HSEF.L
2.9%

Energy

HPRO.L

-

HSEF.L
4.2%

Healthcare

HPRO.L

-

HSEF.L
4.0%

Industrials

HPRO.L

-

HSEF.L
4.8%

Utilities

HPRO.L

-

HSEF.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPRO.L
HPRO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HPRO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPRO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPRO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HPRO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPRO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

HSEF.L
HSEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HSEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPRO.LHSEF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.48

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

4.16

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

14.08

-10.78

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPRO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the HSEF.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPRO.L and HSEF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPRO.LHSEF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.73

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.48

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.60

-0.39

Drawdowns

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPRO.L drawdown since its inception was -36.31%, which is greater than HSEF.L's maximum drawdown of -23.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPRO.L and HSEF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPRO.LHSEF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.31%

-23.33%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-9.67%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.45%

-15.36%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.68%

-19.36%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.56%

-1.18%

-14.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-9.31%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.86%

-0.03%

Volatility

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) is 3.15%, while HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that HPRO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPRO.LHSEF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

5.46%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

11.64%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

14.77%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

15.64%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

15.72%

-0.12%

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPRO.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than HSEF.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HPRO.L vs. HSEF.L - Dividend Comparison

HPRO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while HSEF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPRO.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
HSEF.L
HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HPRO.L and HSEF.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSEF.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSEF.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRO.L.

HPRO.L is categorized as REIT, while HSEF.L is Emerging Markets Equities. HPRO.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while HSEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HPRO.L and 0.18% for HSEF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPRO.L and HSEF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer