HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L
HPRO.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) and EPRA.L (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from HSBC and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HPRO.L returned -0.95%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for EPRA.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HPRO.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EPRA.L.
Performance
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPRO.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than EPRA.L's 6.55% return.
HPRO.L
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
EPRA.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 12.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- —
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 5.03% | 0.35% | -1.94% | 1.11% | -18.31% | 24.70% | -14.95% | 13.99% | -3.06% | -0.79% |
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | 6.55% | 3.12% | 1.31% | 4.40% | -16.02% | 27.84% | -11.99% | 17.30% | -0.56% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPRO.L and EPRA.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between HPRO.L and EPRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HPRO.L
EPRA.L
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HPRO.L
EPRA.L
Technology
HPRO.L
EPRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
HPRO.L
EPRA.L
Financial Services
HPRO.L
EPRA.L
Basic Materials
HPRO.L
-
EPRA.L
Communication Services
HPRO.L
-
EPRA.L
Consumer Defensive
HPRO.L
-
EPRA.L
Energy
HPRO.L
-
EPRA.L
Healthcare
HPRO.L
-
EPRA.L
Industrials
HPRO.L
-
EPRA.L
Utilities
HPRO.L
-
EPRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
HPRO.L
EPRA.L
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPRO.L | EPRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.39 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 4.89 | -1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPRO.L | EPRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.18 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.14 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.19 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPRO.L drawdown since its inception was -36.31%, roughly equal to the maximum EPRA.L drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPRO.L and EPRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPRO.L | EPRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.31% | -35.65% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -8.95% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.45% | -17.01% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.68% | -26.59% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.56% | -3.73% | -11.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -9.83% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.54% | +0.29% |
Volatility
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) have volatilities of 3.15% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPRO.L | EPRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 3.20% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 8.52% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 10.52% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 13.74% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 15.50% | +0.10% |
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPRO.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than EPRA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HPRO.L vs. EPRA.L - Dividend Comparison
HPRO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPRO.L and EPRA.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EPRA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EPRA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRO.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HPRO.L and 0.10% for EPRA.L.
Find the right allocation for HPRO.L and EPRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer