PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HPJP.L is traded in USD, while HUKX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HUKX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HPJP.L having a 7.76% return and HUKX.L slightly higher at 7.82%.


HPJP.L

1D
-1.56%
1M
-1.56%
6M
2.77%
YTD
7.76%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
10Y*

HUKX.L

1D
0.95%
1M
1.66%
6M
5.23%
YTD
7.82%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
8.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HPJP.L
HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
7.76%23.28%-3.07%16.34%-24.08%-1.77%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
7.82%35.72%7.75%13.02%-6.16%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HPJP.L and HUKX.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.57

The correlation between HPJP.L and HUKX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPJP.L
HPJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HPJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HPJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HPJP.LHUKX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.25

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

7.08

-1.33

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPJP.L and HUKX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPJP.L drawdown since its inception was -33.79%, smaller than the maximum HUKX.L drawdown of -42.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPJP.L and HUKX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPJP.LHUKX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.79%

-42.05%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-9.74%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-13.28%

-10.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-2.13%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-7.71%

-7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

3.11%

+1.16%

Volatility

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) at 3.86%. This indicates that HPJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPJP.LHUKX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

3.86%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.56%

11.67%

+6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.49%

13.64%

+8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.74%

16.36%

+8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

17.53%

+7.21%

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than HUKX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HPJP.L vs. HUKX.L - Dividend Comparison

HPJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPJP.L
HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
2.81%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


HPJP.L and HUKX.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HPJP.L.

HPJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HUKX.L is Europe Equities. HPJP.L tracks HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF, while HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HPJP.L and 0.07% for HUKX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPJP.L and HUKX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer