HPF vs. LBFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HPF (John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II) and LBFFX (Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, HPF returned 4.88%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for LBFFX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HPF charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for LBFFX.

Performance

HPF vs. LBFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPF achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than LBFFX's 22.45% return. Over the past 10 years, HPF has underperformed LBFFX with an annualized return of 4.88%, while LBFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.

HPF

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: 4.88%

LBFFX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 5.66%
• YTD: 22.45%
• 6M: 22.84%
• 1Y: 42.04%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 7.29%
• 10Y*: 13.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPF vs. LBFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II	2.64%	6.34%	14.41%	10.78%	-18.44%	17.90%	-7.67%	27.95%	-5.38%	14.74%
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F	22.45%	22.11%	13.82%	7.16%	-23.30%	1.26%	64.16%	24.19%	-5.89%	16.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HPF and LBFFX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007	0.40

Return for Risk

HPF vs. LBFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPF

HPF Risk / Return Rank: 21
HPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
HPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HPF Omega Ratio Rank: 23
HPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HPF Martin Ratio Rank: 17

LBFFX

LBFFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
LBFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LBFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LBFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LBFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LBFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPF vs. LBFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HPF	LBFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	2.93	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	3.81	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.51	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	6.10	-4.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.77	22.79	-18.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HPF vs. LBFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPF Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the LBFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPF and LBFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HPF	LBFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	2.93	-1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.56	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.98	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.69	-0.41

Drawdowns

HPF vs. LBFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPF drawdown since its inception was -66.73%, which is greater than LBFFX's maximum drawdown of -41.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPF and LBFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HPF	LBFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.73%	-41.13%	-25.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.18%	-7.07%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.91%	-12.15%	-4.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.24%	-30.86%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.76%	-33.61%	-21.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	0.00%	-2.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.52%	-10.31%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	1.89%	+0.39%

Volatility

HPF vs. LBFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF) is 3.25%, while Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that HPF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HPF	LBFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	5.38%	-2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.60%	12.19%	-5.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.15%	14.72%	-6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	13.00%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.08%	13.67%	+8.41%

HPF vs. LBFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than LBFFX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

HPF vs. LBFFX - Dividend Comparison

HPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, more than LBFFX's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II	9.34%	9.22%	8.95%	9.39%	9.45%	7.10%	7.80%	7.32%	8.96%	7.82%	8.30%	7.85%
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F	1.22%	1.80%	2.22%	1.95%	2.60%	18.44%	16.27%	8.71%	4.91%	2.47%	3.64%	3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HPF and LBFFX in my portfolio?

HPF and LBFFX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HPF or LBFFX?

LBFFX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to HPF (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPF dropped -66.73% vs LBFFX's -41.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LBFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.