PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hsbc Etfs PLC - Hsbc Msci Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned Ucits Etf (HPEM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPEM.L achieves a 17.86% return, which is significantly lower than EMVL.L's 31.45% return.


HPEM.L

1D
0.66%
1M
-5.69%
6M
12.47%
YTD
17.86%
1Y
35.57%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
10Y*

EMVL.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-9.38%
6M
23.78%
YTD
31.45%
1Y
56.66%
3Y*
31.82%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HPEM.L
Hsbc Etfs PLC - Hsbc Msci Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned Ucits Etf
17.86%32.60%6.21%6.27%-13.68%
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
31.45%43.13%14.49%18.37%-12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HPEM.L and EMVL.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022

0.90

The correlation between HPEM.L and EMVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPEM.L
HPEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HPEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HPEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hsbc Etfs PLC - Hsbc Msci Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned Ucits Etf (HPEM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HPEM.LEMVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

4.51

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

12.55

-3.15

HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPEM.L and EMVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPEM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum EMVL.L drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPEM.L and EMVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPEM.LEMVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-34.95%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-12.49%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-16.42%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.81%

-12.45%

+4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-9.51%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

4.50%

-0.60%

Volatility

HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hsbc Etfs PLC - Hsbc Msci Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned Ucits Etf (HPEM.L) is 9.19%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that HPEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPEM.LEMVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

10.34%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.87%

21.31%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.17%

23.82%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.08%

20.71%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

21.39%

-2.31%

Dividends

HPEM.L vs. EMVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HPEM.L nor EMVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HPEM.L and EMVL.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HPEM.L tracks Hsbc Etfs PLC - Hsbc Msci Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned Ucits Etf, while EMVL.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPEM.L and EMVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer