HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HPAX.L (HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF) and HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from HSBC - HPAX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD while HTWN.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HPAX.L returned 18.32%/yr vs 42.23%/yr for HTWN.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HPAX.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWN.L.

Performance

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAX.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HPAX.L is traded in GBP, while HTWN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HTWN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPAX.L achieves a 27.26% return, which is significantly lower than HTWN.L's 71.35% return.

HPAX.L

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 9.85%
• YTD: 27.26%
• 6M: 29.75%
• 1Y: 52.62%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HTWN.L

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 20.41%
• YTD: 71.35%
• 6M: 76.45%
• 1Y: 124.97%
• 3Y*: 42.23%
• 5Y*: 23.93%
• 10Y*: 24.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HPAX.L HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF	27.26%	17.60%	11.84%	-2.35%	-3.87%
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD	71.35%	23.15%	27.50%	21.28%	-13.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HPAX.L and HTWN.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022	0.73

The correlation between HPAX.L and HTWN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPAX.L

HPAX.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
HPAX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HPAX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
HPAX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HPAX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HPAX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

HTWN.L

HTWN.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
HTWN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HTWN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HTWN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HTWN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HTWN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAX.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HPAX.L	HTWN.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	5.49	-2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	6.35	-2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.87	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.15	14.03	-8.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.99	38.67	-21.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPAX.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is lower than the HTWN.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPAX.L and HTWN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HPAX.L	HTWN.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	5.49	-2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	1.13	-0.40

Drawdowns

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPAX.L drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum HTWN.L drawdown of -31.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAX.L and HTWN.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HPAX.L	HTWN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	-31.84%	+13.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.17%	-8.86%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.77%	-29.76%	+10.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	0.00%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.94%	-7.18%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	3.22%	-0.13%

Volatility

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAX.L) is 7.47%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that HPAX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HPAX.L	HTWN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.47%	9.55%	-2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.77%	18.18%	-4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.43%	22.65%	-6.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.84%	20.85%	-5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.84%	23.41%	-7.57%

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPAX.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWN.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HPAX.L vs. HTWN.L - Dividend Comparison

HPAX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HPAX.L HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD	0.95%	1.61%	1.17%	2.79%	3.04%	1.11%	1.79%	2.12%	2.55%	2.04%	2.32%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HPAX.L and HTWN.L in my portfolio?

HPAX.L and HTWN.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HPAX.L or HTWN.L?

On fees, HPAX.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HPAX.L or HTWN.L?

HPAX.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWN.L.

What is the main difference between HPAX.L and HTWN.L?

HPAX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HPAX.L and 0.50% for HTWN.L.