HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L
HPAX.L (HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF) and CSKR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - HPAX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD while CSKR.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HPAX.L returned 17.86%/yr vs 47.78%/yr for CSKR.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HPAX.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CSKR.L.
Performance
HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HPAX.L is traded in GBP, while CSKR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSKR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPAX.L achieves a 25.38% return, which is significantly lower than CSKR.L's 117.58% return.
HPAX.L
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- YTD
- 25.38%
- 6M
- 27.77%
- 1Y
- 49.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSKR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 22.68%
- YTD
- 117.58%
- 6M
- 136.67%
- 1Y
- 252.64%
- 3Y*
- 47.78%
- 5Y*
- 20.93%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPAX.L HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF | 25.38% | 17.60% | 11.84% | -2.35% | -3.87% |
CSKR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) | 107.20% | 85.24% | -21.31% | 13.76% | -10.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPAX.L and CSKR.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022 | 0.60 |
The correlation between HPAX.L and CSKR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L — Risk / Return Rank
HPAX.L
CSKR.L
HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAX.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPAX.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.89 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | 11.58 | -6.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.81 | 41.27 | -25.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPAX.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 6.69 | -3.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.68 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPAX.L drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum CSKR.L drawdown of -44.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAX.L and CSKR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPAX.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -44.32% | +25.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -21.66% | +11.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -28.94% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -0.90% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -17.89% | +11.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 6.09% | -3.00% |
Volatility
HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAX.L) is 7.47%, while iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) has a volatility of 16.80%. This indicates that HPAX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSKR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPAX.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 16.80% | -9.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.87% | 32.75% | -18.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.51% | 37.57% | -21.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 27.59% | -11.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 28.18% | -12.33% |
HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPAX.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CSKR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HPAX.L vs. CSKR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HPAX.L nor CSKR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HPAX.L and CSKR.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HPAX.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HPAX.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSKR.L.
HPAX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while CSKR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HPAX.L and 0.65% for CSKR.L.
Find the right allocation for HPAX.L and CSKR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer