PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAU.DE) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPAU.DE achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly lower than QDVR.DE's 14.85% return.


HPAU.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
7.25%
YTD
11.46%
6M
10.58%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
10Y*

QDVR.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
4.69%
YTD
14.85%
6M
14.33%
1Y
22.48%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HPAU.DE
HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.46%1.05%32.02%25.22%-19.66%12.01%
QDVR.DE
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.85%-0.76%20.30%20.26%-14.38%16.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HPAU.DE and QDVR.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2021

0.91

The correlation between HPAU.DE and QDVR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPAU.DE
HPAU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HPAU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPAU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPAU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HPAU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPAU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVR.DE
QDVR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QDVR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAU.DE) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPAU.DEQDVR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.09

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

10.29

-4.12

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPAU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the QDVR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPAU.DE and QDVR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPAU.DEQDVR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.76

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.89

-0.22

Drawdowns

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPAU.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.26%, smaller than the maximum QDVR.DE drawdown of -32.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAU.DE and QDVR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPAU.DEQDVR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-32.87%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-7.24%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.26%

-23.91%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

0.00%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-4.41%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

2.18%

+1.68%

Volatility

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAU.DE) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPAU.DEQDVR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.67%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

9.02%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

12.69%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

15.53%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.34%

+0.29%

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPAU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVR.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HPAU.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HPAU.DE nor QDVR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HPAU.DE and QDVR.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HPAU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVR.DE.

HPAU.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned, while QDVR.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HPAU.DE and 0.20% for QDVR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPAU.DE and QDVR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer