PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HPAS.L is traded in GBP, while BBUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BBUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HPAS.L having a 10.62% return and BBUS.L slightly lower at 10.46%.


HPAS.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.13%
YTD
10.62%
6M
10.58%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.64%
YTD
10.46%
6M
10.30%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HPAS.L
HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.62%5.65%26.90%22.43%-14.66%11.67%
BBUS.L
BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc
10.46%9.16%27.18%21.25%-10.45%10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HPAS.L and BBUS.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.91

The correlation between HPAS.L and BBUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPAS.L
HPAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HPAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HPAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS.L
BBUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPAS.LBBUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

3.70

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

12.18

-5.94

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPAS.L and BBUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPAS.LBBUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.39

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.90

-0.13

Drawdowns

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPAS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum BBUS.L drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAS.L and BBUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPAS.LBBUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.23%

-26.39%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-7.71%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.23%

-21.39%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.27%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-3.81%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

2.34%

+2.04%

Volatility

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) is 3.25%, while BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that HPAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPAS.LBBUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.61%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

8.70%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

11.98%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

15.58%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

17.27%

-1.54%

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPAS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HPAS.L vs. BBUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HPAS.L nor BBUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HPAS.L and BBUS.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for HPAS.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HPAS.L and 0.04% for BBUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPAS.L and BBUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer