PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAO.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HPAO.L is traded in GBP, while HSPX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HSPX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPAO.L achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than HSPX.L's 10.50% return.


HPAO.L

1D
-0.42%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.39%
6M
6.65%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
10Y*

HSPX.L

1D
0.01%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.42%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
16.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HPAO.L
HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
6.39%10.30%20.31%18.86%-12.38%11.05%
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.50%9.36%27.32%19.94%-9.10%13.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HPAO.L and HSPX.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021

0.95

The correlation between HPAO.L and HSPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HPAO.L
HSPX.L

Technology

35.7%
38.0%

Financial Services

15.3%
11.3%

Healthcare

9.3%
8.4%

Communication Services

9.2%
10.8%

Industrials

9.1%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
9.9%

Real Estate

6.9%
1.9%

Utilities

3.1%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
4.7%

Energy

0.0%
3.4%

Technology

HPAO.L
35.7%
HSPX.L
38.0%

Financial Services

HPAO.L
15.3%
HSPX.L
11.3%

Healthcare

HPAO.L
9.3%
HSPX.L
8.4%

Communication Services

HPAO.L
9.2%
HSPX.L
10.8%

Industrials

HPAO.L
9.1%
HSPX.L
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HPAO.L
8.3%
HSPX.L
9.9%

Real Estate

HPAO.L
6.9%
HSPX.L
1.9%

Utilities

HPAO.L
3.1%
HSPX.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

HPAO.L
1.8%
HSPX.L
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

HPAO.L
1.3%
HSPX.L
4.7%

Energy

HPAO.L
0.0%
HSPX.L
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPAO.L
HPAO.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HPAO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPAO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPAO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HPAO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPAO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

HSPX.L
HSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAO.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPAO.LHSPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

4.05

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.86

14.81

-6.95

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPAO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPAO.L and HSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPAO.LHSPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.72

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.97

-0.21

Drawdowns

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPAO.L drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, smaller than the maximum HSPX.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAO.L and HSPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPAO.LHSPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-25.43%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.96%

-7.16%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-20.76%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.24%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-3.44%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.96%

+0.87%

Volatility

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAO.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPAO.LHSPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.66%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

7.23%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

10.65%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

14.22%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

15.47%

-1.58%

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPAO.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HPAO.L vs. HSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

HPAO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPAO.L
HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.82%0.93%0.98%1.19%1.27%0.95%1.41%1.47%1.60%1.54%1.49%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, HPAO.L and HSPX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HPAO.L.

HPAO.L is categorized as Global Equities, while HSPX.L is S&P 500. HPAO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HPAO.L and 0.09% for HSPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPAO.L and HSPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer