HOYY vs. MARO
HOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF) and MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MARO.
Performance
HOYY vs. MARO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOYY achieves a -29.50% return, which is significantly lower than MARO's 27.88% return.
HOYY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- -29.50%
- 6M
- -37.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARO
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- 12.47%
- YTD
- 27.88%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- -26.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOYY vs. MARO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF | -29.50% | -24.36% |
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 27.88% | -46.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOYY and MARO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOYY vs. MARO — Risk / Return Rank
HOYY
MARO
HOYY vs. MARO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF (HOYY) and YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOYY | MARO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.65 | -0.54 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
HOYY vs. MARO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOYY drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, smaller than the maximum MARO drawdown of -71.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOYY and MARO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOYY | MARO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.54% | -71.75% | +20.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -65.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.50% | -51.27% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -41.97% | +9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 38.58% | — |
Volatility
HOYY vs. MARO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOYY | MARO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.03% | 61.49% | -24.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.03% | 65.15% | -28.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.03% | 65.15% | -28.12% |
HOYY vs. MARO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MARO's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOYY vs. MARO - Dividend Comparison
HOYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 187.33%, more than MARO's 183.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF | 187.33% | 50.51% |
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 183.99% | 277.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOYY and MARO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MARO is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MARO is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for HOYY.
HOYY has the higher dividend yield at 187.33%, compared with 183.99% for MARO.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HOYY and 0.99% for MARO.
Find the right allocation for HOYY and MARO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer