HOU.TO vs. QQCC.TO
HOU.TO (BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOU.TO is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Global X, while QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X. Over the past 10 years, HOU.TO returned -31.85%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for QQCC.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HOU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOU.TO achieves a 57.24% return, which is significantly higher than QQCC.TO's 19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, HOU.TO has underperformed QQCC.TO with an annualized return of -31.85%, while QQCC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.44% annualized return.
HOU.TO
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -34.92%
- YTD
- 57.24%
- 6M
- 54.60%
- 1Y
- 31.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- -31.85%
QQCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
HOU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOU.TO BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF | 57.24% | -29.90% | 9.54% | -26.61% | 21.66% | 115.44% | -98.65% | 45.25% | -45.81% | -5.96% |
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 19.37% | 11.64% | 33.42% | 35.92% | -55.98% | 5.24% | -6.26% | 12.55% | -18.79% | 15.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOU.TO and QQCC.TO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2011 | 0.19 |
The correlation between HOU.TO and QQCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOU.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HOU.TO
QQCC.TO
HOU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF (HOU.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOU.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.42 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 4.16 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 14.76 | -13.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than QQCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOU.TO and QQCC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOU.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -67.77% | -32.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.71% | -8.15% | -45.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.99% | -22.24% | -35.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.60% | -59.13% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.64% | -62.91% | -36.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -21.01% | -78.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.64% | -28.26% | -67.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.51% | 2.29% | +19.22% |
Volatility
HOU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF (HOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 23.66% compared to Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) at 7.78%. This indicates that HOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOU.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.66% | 7.78% | +15.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.57% | 12.24% | +65.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.94% | 14.62% | +70.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.00% | 28.41% | +46.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.38% | 23.30% | +56.08% |
Dividends
HOU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
HOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOU.TO BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 10.42% | 11.27% | 9.84% | 11.79% | 11.06% | 2.58% | 2.92% | 3.14% | 3.96% | 3.00% | 3.36% | 4.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOU.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while QQCC.TO is Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for HOU.TO and QQCC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer