HOSGX vs. FUMBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Homestead Funds Short-Term Government Securities Fund (HOSGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX).
HOSGX is managed by Homestead. It was launched on Apr 30, 1995. FUMBX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2005.
Performance
HOSGX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HOSGX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOSGX Homestead Funds Short-Term Government Securities Fund | -0.08% | 5.35% | 2.80% | 4.44% | -5.42% | -1.19% | 4.11% | 3.35% | 1.25% | -0.09% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.16% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOSGX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than FUMBX's 0.16% return.
HOSGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 3.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
FUMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HOSGX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOSGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HOSGX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank
HOSGX
FUMBX
HOSGX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Funds Short-Term Government Securities Fund (HOSGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOSGX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.65 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 2.61 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.49 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 8.60 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOSGX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.65 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.47 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.74 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between HOSGX and FUMBX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HOSGX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison
HOSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than FUMBX's 3.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOSGX Homestead Funds Short-Term Government Securities Fund | 2.91% | 3.20% | 2.96% | 2.28% | 1.20% | 0.33% | 2.52% | 1.94% | 1.44% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.85% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.67% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HOSGX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOSGX drawdown since its inception was -7.99%, smaller than the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOSGX and FUMBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOSGX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -8.83% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.38% | -1.54% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.72% | -8.60% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.80% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -1.88% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.44% | -0.01% |
Volatility
HOSGX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Homestead Funds Short-Term Government Securities Fund (HOSGX) is 0.68%, while Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that HOSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HOSGX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 0.83% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.58% | 1.39% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48% | 2.32% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 2.89% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 2.49% | +0.11% |