HOOD vs. NTES
HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) and NTES (NetEase, Inc.) are both stocks. HOOD operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while NTES operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, HOOD returned 113.32%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for NTES. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HOOD vs. NTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOD achieves a -17.60% return, which is significantly lower than NTES's -7.12% return.
HOOD
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 15.48%
- YTD
- -17.60%
- 6M
- -22.02%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 113.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTES
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -8.13%
- 1Y
- -0.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.45%
HOOD vs. NTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | -17.60% | 203.54% | 192.46% | 56.51% | -54.17% | -53.26% |
NTES NetEase, Inc. | -7.12% | 58.28% | -1.73% | 30.59% | -27.35% | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOD and NTES is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
HOOD:
$85.27B
NTES:
$81.21B
HOOD:
$2.07
NTES:
CN¥52.95
HOOD:
45.04
NTES:
16.10
HOOD:
0.00
NTES:
0.76
HOOD:
21.83
NTES:
4.80
HOOD:
8.80
NTES:
3.34
HOOD:
$3.91B
NTES:
CN¥114.39B
HOOD:
$2.86B
NTES:
CN¥75.14B
HOOD:
$1.80B
NTES:
CN¥40.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOD vs. NTES — Risk / Return Rank
HOOD
NTES
HOOD vs. NTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOD | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.01 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | -0.10 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | -0.17 | +1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOD vs. NTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOD drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, smaller than the maximum NTES drawdown of -96.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOD and NTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOD | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.21% | -96.54% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.26% | -30.46% | -26.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.26% | -33.97% | -23.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.88% | -19.45% | -19.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.85% | -24.66% | -36.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.69% | 17.18% | +14.51% |
Volatility
HOOD vs. NTES - Volatility Comparison
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a higher volatility of 23.07% compared to NetEase, Inc. (NTES) at 9.60%. This indicates that HOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOD | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.07% | 9.60% | +13.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.85% | 20.92% | +29.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.33% | 29.31% | +40.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.06% | 43.67% | +30.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.06% | 41.81% | +32.25% |
Dividends
HOOD vs. NTES - Dividend Comparison
HOOD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTES NetEase, Inc. | 2.40% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 0.80% | 0.97% | 3.19% | 0.71% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.98% |
Financials
HOOD vs. NTES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Robinhood Markets, Inc. and NetEase, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HOOD vs. NTES - Profitability Comparison
HOOD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NTES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 30.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.
HOOD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
NTES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.66B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.
HOOD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 346.00M and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in a net margin of 96.4%.
NTES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOD and NTES have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOD has higher volatility (23.07%) compared to NTES (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOD dropped -90.21% vs NTES's -96.54%.
HOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOD and NTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer