HOMZ vs. PYZ
HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and PYZ (Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOMZ is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while PYZ is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOMZ returned 4.71%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for PYZ. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PYZ.
Performance
HOMZ vs. PYZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than PYZ's 8.88% return.
HOMZ
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.20%
PYZ
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.42K | $133.49K | $168.14K | |
| $196.01K | $267.41K | $247.00K |
HOMZ vs. PYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 3.43% | 2.72% | 9.49% | 36.49% | -28.14% | 41.02% | 15.80% | 17.38% |
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF | 8.88% | 28.01% | 2.54% | 9.56% | -15.45% | 32.68% | 15.39% | 7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOMZ and PYZ is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HOMZ and PYZ has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HOMZ vs. PYZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOMZ
PYZ
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HOMZ
PYZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
HOMZ
PYZ
Industrials
HOMZ
PYZ
Financial Services
HOMZ
PYZ
Basic Materials
HOMZ
PYZ
Consumer Defensive
HOMZ
PYZ
Technology
HOMZ
PYZ
-
Communication Services
HOMZ
PYZ
-
Energy
HOMZ
-
PYZ
Healthcare
HOMZ
-
PYZ
-
Utilities
HOMZ
-
PYZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOMZ vs. PYZ — Risk / Return Rank
HOMZ
PYZ
HOMZ vs. PYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOMZ | PYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.52 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 4.33 | -3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOMZ vs. PYZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum PYZ drawdown of -65.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and PYZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOMZ | PYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -65.15% | +17.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | -17.75% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -26.74% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.76% | -32.97% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -10.27% | +3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -12.59% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 6.20% | +1.63% |
Volatility
HOMZ vs. PYZ - Volatility Comparison
Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) at 5.55%. This indicates that HOMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOMZ | PYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 5.55% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 19.85% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 26.66% | -6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 25.51% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 26.43% | -1.51% |
HOMZ vs. PYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PYZ's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOMZ vs. PYZ - Dividend Comparison
HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than PYZ's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.61% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF | 0.50% | 0.72% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 1.18% | 0.33% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.20% | 0.53% | 1.07% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOMZ and PYZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOMZ has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to PYZ (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMZ dropped -48.10% vs PYZ's -65.15%.
On 5-year performance, PYZ leads with 7.91% vs 4.71% for HOMZ. On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PYZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PYZ has performed better with a 7.91% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PYZ.
HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.50% for PYZ.
HOMZ is categorized as Building & Construction, while PYZ is Momentum. HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Hoya Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.60% for PYZ.
PYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOMZ and PYZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer