HOMZ vs. COMT
HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOMZ is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOMZ returned 5.76%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for COMT. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
HOMZ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.
HOMZ
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 10.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 26.18%
- YTD
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
HOMZ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 5.95% | 2.72% | 9.49% | 36.49% | -28.14% | 41.02% | 15.80% | 17.38% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 30.19% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | -18.66% | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOMZ and COMT is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019 | 0.13 |
The correlation between HOMZ and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOMZ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
HOMZ
COMT
HOMZ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOMZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.90 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | 6.35 | -4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOMZ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOMZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -51.89% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | -17.57% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -17.57% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.76% | -29.00% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.28% | -11.28% | +7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -23.95% | +14.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 5.24% | +2.48% |
Volatility
HOMZ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.91%. This indicates that HOMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOMZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 5.91% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.50% | 19.67% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | 21.54% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 21.20% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 18.85% | +6.09% |
HOMZ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOMZ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.95% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.34% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOMZ and COMT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOMZ has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to COMT (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMZ dropped -48.10% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 11.75% vs 5.76% for HOMZ. On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 2.34% for HOMZ.
HOMZ is categorized as Building & Construction, while COMT is Commodities. HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Pettee Investors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOMZ and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer