HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BSR Real Estate Investment Trust (HOM-U.TO) and Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO).
Performance
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOM-U.TO BSR Real Estate Investment Trust | -12.23% | 6.87% | 5.54% | -6.03% | -24.52% | 62.06% | 0.08% | 51.03% | -14.43% |
CSH-UN.TO Chartwell Retirement Residences | 4.38% | 44.44% | 24.00% | 51.19% | -29.33% | 11.93% | -12.81% | 11.16% | -9.49% |
Different Trading Currencies
HOM-U.TO is traded in USD, while CSH-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CSH-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
HOM-U.TO:
$310.46M
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$6.55B
HOM-U.TO:
-$2.13
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$0.10
HOM-U.TO:
2.27
CSH-UN.TO:
5.71
HOM-U.TO:
0.53
CSH-UN.TO:
3.83
HOM-U.TO:
$144.38M
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$1.11B
HOM-U.TO:
$72.72M
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$312.56M
HOM-U.TO:
-$12.51M
CSH-UN.TO:
CA$392.70M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOM-U.TO achieves a -12.23% return, which is significantly lower than CSH-UN.TO's 4.38% return.
HOM-U.TO
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -15.09%
- YTD
- -12.23%
- 6M
- -11.11%
- 1Y
- -14.79%
- 3Y*
- -3.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CSH-UN.TO
- 1D
- 4.84%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 5.70%
- 1Y
- 34.10%
- 3Y*
- 39.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HOM-U.TO
CSH-UN.TO
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BSR Real Estate Investment Trust (HOM-U.TO) and Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOM-U.TO | CSH-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | 1.54 | -2.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | 2.32 | -2.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.27 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 2.56 | -3.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 9.54 | -11.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOM-U.TO | CSH-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | 1.54 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.67 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.52 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between HOM-U.TO and CSH-UN.TO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
HOM-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than CSH-UN.TO's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOM-U.TO BSR Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.74% | 3.21% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 3.03% | 2.27% | 3.34% | 3.26% | 2.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSH-UN.TO Chartwell Retirement Residences | 2.91% | 3.04% | 4.06% | 5.22% | 7.25% | 5.18% | 5.45% | 4.30% | 4.29% | 3.52% | 3.79% | 4.32% |
Drawdowns
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOM-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.81%, smaller than the maximum CSH-UN.TO drawdown of -60.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOM-U.TO and CSH-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOM-U.TO | CSH-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.81% | -79.53% | +27.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.84% | -11.88% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.81% | -39.92% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.97% | -4.92% | -38.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.52% | -15.85% | -6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.83% | 3.48% | +5.35% |
Volatility
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
BSR Real Estate Investment Trust (HOM-U.TO) and Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH-UN.TO) have volatilities of 9.76% and 9.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HOM-U.TO | CSH-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 9.70% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.12% | 16.21% | +4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.60% | 22.23% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 23.13% | +5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 26.86% | +2.57% |
Financials
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BSR Real Estate Investment Trust and Chartwell Retirement Residences. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HOM-U.TO vs. CSH-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
HOM-U.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BSR Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 23.35M and revenue of 34.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.
CSH-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported a gross profit of -18.84M and revenue of 300.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -6.3%.
HOM-U.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BSR Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 18.43M and revenue of 34.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.5%.
CSH-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported an operating income of 36.01M and revenue of 300.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.
HOM-U.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BSR Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -3.34M and revenue of 34.48M, resulting in a net margin of -9.7%.
CSH-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chartwell Retirement Residences reported a net income of 7.24M and revenue of 300.29M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.