PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLD vs. QIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLD vs. QIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLD achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than QIS's -28.01% return.


HOLD

1D
-0.41%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
8.53%
6M
7.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QIS

1D
1.45%
1M
-21.57%
YTD
-28.01%
6M
-28.49%
1Y
-49.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLD vs. QIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOLD
Harbor Alpha Layering ETF
8.53%8.77%
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
-28.01%-27.26%

Correlation

The correlation between HOLD and QIS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLD vs. QIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QIS
QIS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLD vs. QIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOLDQISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.55

HOLD vs. QIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOLD vs. QIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLD drawdown since its inception was -9.47%, smaller than the maximum QIS drawdown of -58.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLD and QIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLDQISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-58.39%

+48.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-57.79%

+52.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-14.33%

+12.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.73%

Volatility

HOLD vs. QIS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLDQISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

38.87%

-23.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

29.38%

-13.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.43%

29.38%

-13.95%

HOLD vs. QIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLD has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QIS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLD vs. QIS - Dividend Comparison

HOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, more than QIS's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOLD
Harbor Alpha Layering ETF
6.74%7.32%0.00%0.00%
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
1.87%3.37%1.07%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOLD and QIS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOLD is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOLD is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QIS.

HOLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.74%, compared with 1.87% for QIS.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HOLD and 1.00% for QIS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLD and QIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer