HOLD vs. QIS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HOLD (Harbor Alpha Layering ETF) and QIS (Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF) are both Multistrategy funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOLD charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for QIS.

Performance

HOLD vs. QIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLD achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than QIS's -32.48% return.

HOLD

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -2.78%
• 6M: 3.40%
• YTD: 4.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QIS

• 1D: -3.21%
• 1M: -5.60%
• 6M: -35.50%
• YTD: -32.48%
• 1Y: -51.81%
• 3Y*: -24.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLD vs. QIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOLD Harbor Alpha Layering ETF	4.88%	8.77%
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	-32.48%	-27.26%

Correlation

The correlation between HOLD and QIS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

HOLD vs. QIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QIS

QIS Risk / Return Rank: 0
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLD vs. QIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOLD	QIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.35	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-2.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.75	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.68	—

Drawdowns

HOLD vs. QIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLD drawdown since its inception was -9.47%, smaller than the maximum QIS drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLD and QIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOLD	QIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-61.25%	+51.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-61.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.04%	-60.41%	+52.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-15.42%	+12.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOLD	QIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.45%	38.39%	-22.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	29.48%	-14.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.45%	29.48%	-14.03%

HOLD vs. QIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLD has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QIS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOLD vs. QIS - Dividend Comparison

HOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than QIS's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HOLD Harbor Alpha Layering ETF	6.98%	7.32%	0.00%	0.00%
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	2.02%	3.37%	1.07%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOLD and QIS in my portfolio?

HOLD and QIS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HOLD or QIS?

On fees, HOLD is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOLD or QIS?

HOLD is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOLD or QIS?

HOLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 2.02% for QIS.

What is the main difference between HOLD and QIS?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HOLD and 1.00% for QIS.