HOLD vs. HAPS

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HOLD (Harbor Alpha Layering ETF) and HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOLD is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Harbor, while HAPS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross. HOLD is actively managed, while HAPS is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOLD charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HAPS.

Performance

HOLD vs. HAPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLD achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than HAPS's 10.28% return.

HOLD

• 1D: -2.41%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 6M: 11.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HAPS

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -1.35%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 10.09%
• 1Y: 26.44%
• 3Y*: 10.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLD vs. HAPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOLD Harbor Alpha Layering ETF	11.09%	8.60%
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	10.28%	5.56%

Correlation

The correlation between HOLD and HAPS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

HOLD vs. HAPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAPS

HAPS Risk / Return Rank: 51
HAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
HAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
HAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
HAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLD vs. HAPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOLD	HAPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.71	0.54	+1.16

Drawdowns

HOLD vs. HAPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLD drawdown since its inception was -9.47%, smaller than the maximum HAPS drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLD and HAPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOLD	HAPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-27.44%	+17.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.59%	-1.44%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.95%	-6.12%	+4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOLD	HAPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.41%	17.10%	-1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.41%	20.84%	-5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.41%	20.84%	-5.43%

HOLD vs. HAPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLD has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HAPS's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOLD vs. HAPS - Dividend Comparison

HOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than HAPS's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	0.51%	0.57%	0.72%	0.42%
HOLD Harbor Alpha Layering ETF	6.59%	7.32%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOLD and HAPS in my portfolio?

HOLD and HAPS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HOLD or HAPS?

On fees, HAPS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOLD or HAPS?

HAPS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HOLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOLD or HAPS?

HOLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 0.51% for HAPS.

What is the main difference between HOLD and HAPS?

HOLD is categorized as Multistrategy, while HAPS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HOLD and 0.60% for HAPS.