HOLA vs. QQHG
HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQHG.
Performance
HOLA vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 11.71% return.
HOLA
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQHG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOLA vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 4.14% | 7.55% |
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 11.71% | 9.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOLA and QQHG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOLA vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank
HOLA
QQHG
HOLA vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOLA | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 3.40 | -1.96 |
Drawdowns
HOLA vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and QQHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOLA | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -6.18% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | 0.00% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -0.97% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
HOLA vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOLA | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.52% | 9.47% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 9.54% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 9.54% | -0.02% |
HOLA vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOLA vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison
HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than QQHG's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.90% | 3.02% |
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 0.20% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOLA and QQHG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.
HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.45% for QQHG.
Find the right allocation for HOLA and QQHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer