PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. QQHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 11.71% return.


HOLA

1D
0.28%
1M
1.14%
YTD
4.14%
6M
6.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQHG

1D
0.16%
1M
4.95%
YTD
11.71%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and QQHG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOLA vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOLAQQHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

3.40

-1.96

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and QQHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLAQQHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-6.18%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

0.00%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-0.97%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

Volatility

HOLA vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLAQQHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

9.47%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.52%

9.54%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.52%

9.54%

-0.02%

HOLA vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLA vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than QQHG's 0.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and QQHG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.45% for QQHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and QQHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer