HOLA vs. OILK
HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. HOLA is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
HOLA vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 53.61% return.
HOLA
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 53.61%
- 6M
- 53.65%
- 1Y
- 35.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- —
HOLA vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 4.66% | 7.60% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 53.61% | -9.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOLA and OILK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOLA vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
HOLA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILK
HOLA vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOLA | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOLA vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOLA | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -83.76% | +76.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -9.88% | +8.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -32.52% | +31.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.63% | — |
Volatility
HOLA vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOLA | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 29.13% | -19.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.57% | 30.21% | -20.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.57% | 35.97% | -26.40% |
HOLA vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOLA vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than OILK's 8.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.89% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.74% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOLA and OILK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 2.89% for HOLA.
HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.68% for OILK.
Find the right allocation for HOLA and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer