HOLA vs. HECO
HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and HECO (State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while HECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for HECO.
Performance
HOLA vs. HECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than HECO's 72.76% return.
HOLA
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 4.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HECO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 12.83%
- YTD
- 72.76%
- 6M
- 65.53%
- 1Y
- 136.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOLA vs. HECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 5.56% | 7.60% |
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 72.76% | 19.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOLA and HECO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.53 |
HOLA vs. HECO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOLA
HECO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
HOLA
HECO
Industrials
HOLA
HECO
Technology
HOLA
HECO
Healthcare
HOLA
HECO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HOLA
HECO
-
Consumer Defensive
HOLA
HECO
-
Basic Materials
HOLA
HECO
Communication Services
HOLA
HECO
-
Utilities
HOLA
HECO
-
Energy
HOLA
HECO
-
Real Estate
HOLA
HECO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOLA vs. HECO — Risk / Return Rank
HOLA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HECO
HOLA vs. HECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOLA | HECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOLA vs. HECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum HECO drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and HECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOLA | HECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -44.59% | +37.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -1.40% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -11.53% | +10.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility
HOLA vs. HECO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOLA | HECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.93% | 37.49% | -27.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.93% | 44.68% | -34.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.93% | 44.68% | -34.75% |
HOLA vs. HECO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HECO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOLA vs. HECO - Dividend Comparison
HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.86% | 3.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOLA and HECO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.
HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.
HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HECO is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.90% for HECO.
Find the right allocation for HOLA and HECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer