PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 19.14% return.


HOLA

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.77%
YTD
5.56%
6M
4.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.91%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
19.14%
6M
18.06%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and FAAR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOLAFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.18

HOLA vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLAFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-18.03%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-6.29%

+5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-7.82%

+6.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

Volatility

HOLA vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLAFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.93%

13.38%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.93%

12.96%

-3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.93%

11.54%

-1.61%

HOLA vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLA vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than FAAR's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.66%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
HOLA
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
2.86%3.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and FAAR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 2.86% for HOLA.

HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.95% for FAAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer