PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOII vs. PUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOII vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF (HOII) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOII achieves a 19,132.59% return, which is significantly higher than PUSH's 1.46% return.


HOII

1D
0.00%
1M
30,031.23%
YTD
19,132.59%
6M
17,931.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PUSH

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.58%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOII vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOII
REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF
19,132.59%-23.54%
PUSH
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
1.46%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HOII and PUSH is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOII vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PUSH
PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOII vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF (HOII) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOIIPUSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.13

HOII vs. PUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOII vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOII drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOII and PUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOIIPUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-0.85%

-54.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.68%

-0.10%

-36.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

Volatility

HOII vs. PUSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOIIPUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34,045.59%

1.52%

+34,044.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34,045.59%

1.29%

+34,044.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34,045.59%

1.29%

+34,044.30%

HOII vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOII vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

HOII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 120.87%, more than PUSH's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HOII
REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF
120.87%4.41%0.00%
PUSH
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
3.23%3.45%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOII and PUSH have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PUSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PUSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOII.

HOII has the higher dividend yield at 120.87%, compared with 3.23% for PUSH.

HOII is categorized as Derivative Income, while PUSH is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOII and 0.15% for PUSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOII and PUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer