HOIBX vs. QDIBX
HOIBX (Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund) and QDIBX (Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, HOIBX returned -0.63%/yr vs -0.39%/yr for QDIBX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HOIBX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for QDIBX.
Performance
HOIBX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOIBX achieves a -1.24% return, which is significantly lower than QDIBX's -0.78% return.
HOIBX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 0.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- -0.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.36%
QDIBX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 1.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
HOIBX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOIBX Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund | -1.24% | 6.55% | 1.69% | 5.75% | -13.38% | -1.13% | 8.70% | 0.40% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | -0.78% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOIBX and QDIBX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between HOIBX and QDIBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOIBX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank
HOIBX
QDIBX
HOIBX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOIBX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.12 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.87 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 2.09 | -0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOIBX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOIBX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOIBX and QDIBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOIBX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -19.63% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -2.97% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.99% | -5.37% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -19.47% | +1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -2.53% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -6.28% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 1.23% | +0.08% |
Volatility
HOIBX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison
Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) at 0.85%. This indicates that HOIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOIBX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 0.85% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | 2.76% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.03% | 3.67% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 6.58% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 6.21% | -0.70% |
HOIBX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOIBX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOIBX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison
HOIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than QDIBX's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOIBX Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.42% | 3.68% | 3.68% | 2.67% | 2.15% | 1.30% | 3.02% | 2.01% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.52% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOIBX and QDIBX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOIBX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to QDIBX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOIBX dropped -18.15% vs QDIBX's -19.63%.
QDIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOIBX and QDIBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer