HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HOGS.L (WisdomTree Lean Hogs) and GGRG.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - HOGS.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Lean Hogs, while GGRG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOGS.L returned -2.16%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for GGRG.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOGS.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for GGRG.L.

Performance

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Lean Hogs (HOGS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HOGS.L is traded in USD, while GGRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOGS.L achieves a -7.82% return, which is significantly lower than GGRG.L's 5.03% return.

HOGS.L

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -7.82%
• 6M: -3.60%
• 1Y: -6.57%
• 3Y*: 9.10%
• 5Y*: -2.16%
• 10Y*: -6.22%

GGRG.L

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: 16.52%
• 3Y*: 13.34%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HOGS.L WisdomTree Lean Hogs	-7.82%	6.22%	22.20%	-22.50%	9.28%	31.95%	-34.91%	-21.42%	-9.85%	3.39%
GGRG.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc	5.03%	16.53%	9.25%	17.43%	-13.72%	19.80%	15.98%	35.02%	-10.74%	28.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HOGS.L and GGRG.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016	0.05

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOGS.L	GGRG.L
Real Estate	100.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.7%
Communication Services	-	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	15.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.2%
Energy	-	0.0%
Financial Services	-	8.4%
Healthcare	-	15.7%
Industrials	-	18.8%
Technology	-	21.6%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOGS.L

HOGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6
HOGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
HOGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
HOGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6
HOGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HOGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GGRG.L

GGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Lean Hogs (HOGS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HOGS.L	GGRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	1.37	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	2.10	-2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.25	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	1.58	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	6.32	-7.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOGS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOGS.L and GGRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOGS.L	GGRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	1.37	-1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	0.56	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.32	0.79	-1.11

Drawdowns

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOGS.L drawdown since its inception was -93.79%, which is greater than GGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOGS.L and GGRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOGS.L	GGRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.79%	-30.46%	-63.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.24%	-10.40%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.71%	-15.21%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.15%	-25.27%	-17.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.83%	0.00%	-87.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.70%	-4.29%	-70.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.02%	2.61%	+5.41%

Volatility

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Lean Hogs (HOGS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that HOGS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOGS.L	GGRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	2.62%	+2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.71%	9.09%	+3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.58%	12.05%	+6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.97%	14.32%	+17.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.40%	14.76%	+23.64%

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOGS.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRG.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOGS.L vs. GGRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HOGS.L nor GGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOGS.L and GGRG.L in my portfolio?

HOGS.L and GGRG.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HOGS.L or GGRG.L?

On fees, GGRG.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOGS.L or GGRG.L?

GGRG.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HOGS.L.

What is the main difference between HOGS.L and GGRG.L?

HOGS.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while GGRG.L is Global Equities. HOGS.L tracks Bloomberg Lean Hogs, while GGRG.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HOGS.L and 0.38% for GGRG.L.