PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOCT vs. MRCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOCT vs. MRCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MRCP

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.27%
YTD
7.27%
6M
8.29%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOCT vs. MRCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOCT vs. MRCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOCT

MRCP
MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOCT vs. MRCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOCT vs. MRCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOCTMRCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

Drawdowns

HOCT vs. MRCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MRCP drawdown of -10.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and MRCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOCTMRCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-10.73%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.77%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

Volatility

HOCT vs. MRCP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOCTMRCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

6.24%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

9.27%

-9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

9.27%

-9.27%

HOCT vs. MRCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MRCP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOCT vs. MRCP - Dividend Comparison

Neither HOCT nor MRCP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MRCP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MRCP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

HOCT and MRCP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.50% for MRCP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOCT and MRCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer