PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOCT vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOCT vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.01%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.94%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOCT vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOCT vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOCT

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOCT vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOCT vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOCTISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

Drawdowns

HOCT vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and ISWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOCTISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-32.35%

+32.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.03%

+4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-16.17%

+16.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

Volatility

HOCT vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOCTISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

12.20%

-12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.67%

-11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.57%

-11.57%

HOCT vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOCT vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HOCT
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.82%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

ISWN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.49% for ISWN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOCT and ISWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer