HOCT vs. BALT
HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) and BALT (Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOCT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while BALT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. HOCT is actively managed, while BALT is passively managed. HOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BALT.
Performance
HOCT vs. BALT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BALT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF | 1.25% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
BALT
HOCT vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.80 | — |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BALT drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and BALT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.89% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.06% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.34% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 2.19% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.32% | -3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.32% | -3.32% |
HOCT vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOCT vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOCT nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.
HOCT and BALT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
HOCT is categorized as Options Trading, while BALT is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.69% for BALT.
Find the right allocation for HOCT and BALT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer