PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOCT vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOCT vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BALT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.81%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOCT vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOCT vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOCT

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOCT vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOCT vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOCTBALTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.80

Drawdowns

HOCT vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BALT drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and BALT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOCTBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-4.89%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

Volatility

HOCT vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOCTBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

2.19%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

3.32%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

3.32%

-3.32%

HOCT vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOCT vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

Neither HOCT nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, BALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

HOCT and BALT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

HOCT is categorized as Options Trading, while BALT is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.69% for BALT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOCT and BALT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer