PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOBIX vs. NPCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HOBIX vs. NPCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HOBIX vs. NPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HOBIX
Holbrook Income Fund Class I
0.82%7.67%7.66%5.65%-2.91%2.37%
NPCT
Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund
3.03%9.87%17.23%7.78%-37.50%-4.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOBIX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than NPCT's 3.03% return.


HOBIX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
0.82%
6M
2.12%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*

NPCT

1D
3.35%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
3.03%
6M
-1.87%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HOBIX vs. NPCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOBIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NPCT's 5.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HOBIX vs. NPCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOBIX
HOBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HOBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
HOBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NPCT
NPCT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NPCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPCT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NPCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPCT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOBIX vs. NPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOBIXNPCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.23

0.64

+2.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

9.39

0.99

+8.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.88

1.13

+2.75

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.29

1.02

+7.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.92

2.56

+28.36

HOBIX vs. NPCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOBIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the NPCT Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOBIX and NPCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOBIXNPCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

0.64

+2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.25

+1.08

Correlation

The correlation between HOBIX and NPCT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HOBIX vs. NPCT - Dividend Comparison

HOBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than NPCT's 12.55% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HOBIX
Holbrook Income Fund Class I
5.99%6.45%7.04%6.35%5.31%3.97%6.30%3.51%4.32%2.12%
NPCT
Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund
12.55%13.15%12.20%10.28%11.93%3.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HOBIX vs. NPCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum NPCT drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOBIX and NPCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HOBIXNPCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-46.77%

+23.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

-7.30%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-16.35%

+16.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-25.61%

+24.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

2.90%

-2.68%

Volatility

HOBIX vs. NPCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) is 0.25%, while Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that HOBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HOBIXNPCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.25%

4.90%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

6.53%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09%

11.93%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.64%

13.15%

-10.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.78%

13.15%

-7.37%