HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

HNSS.L (HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF) and HPRD.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HNSS.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index, while HPRD.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HNSS.L returned 52.27%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for HPRD.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HNSS.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HPRD.L.

Performance

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HNSS.L is traded in GBP, while HPRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HPRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNSS.L achieves a 75.99% return, which is significantly higher than HPRD.L's 13.34% return.

HNSS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -12.42%
• 6M: 54.44%
• YTD: 75.99%
• 1Y: 132.54%
• 3Y*: 52.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HPRD.L

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 2.83%
• 6M: 9.18%
• YTD: 13.34%
• 1Y: 17.95%
• 3Y*: 8.98%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: 2.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF	75.99%	45.50%	19.96%	32.89%	-25.65%
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF	13.34%	3.01%	1.56%	5.33%	-8.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HNSS.L and HPRD.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2022	0.23

The correlation between HNSS.L and HPRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNSS.L

HNSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HNSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
HNSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HNSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
HNSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

HPRD.L

HPRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
HPRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
HPRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HPRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
HPRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HNSS.L	HPRD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.45	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	2.09	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.25	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	2.07	+2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	6.93	+4.16

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNSS.L and HPRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNSS.L drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, which is greater than HPRD.L's maximum drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNSS.L and HPRD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HNSS.L	HPRD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.32%	-34.71%	-6.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.74%	-8.61%	-21.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.83%	-17.01%	-19.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.76%	0.00%	-18.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.29%	-9.40%	-6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.95%	2.58%	+9.37%

Volatility

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) has a higher volatility of 17.50% compared to HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) at 4.36%. This indicates that HNSS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HNSS.L	HPRD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.50%	4.36%	+13.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.60%	10.31%	+21.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.08%	12.33%	+44.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.97%	15.12%	+23.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.97%	16.08%	+22.89%

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNSS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HPRD.L's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

HNSS.L vs. HPRD.L - Dividend Comparison

HNSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF	2.88%	3.17%	3.39%	3.35%	3.53%	2.30%	2.88%	2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HNSS.L and HPRD.L in my portfolio?

HNSS.L and HPRD.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HNSS.L or HPRD.L?

On fees, HPRD.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HNSS.L or HPRD.L?

HPRD.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HNSS.L.

What is the main difference between HNSS.L and HPRD.L?

HNSS.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while HPRD.L is REIT. HNSS.L tracks Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index, while HPRD.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HNSS.L and 0.24% for HPRD.L.