PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HNSS.L is traded in GBP, while ESP0.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ESP0.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNSS.L achieves a 84.37% return, which is significantly higher than ESP0.DE's -15.26% return.


HNSS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.02%
YTD
84.37%
6M
88.21%
1Y
173.28%
3Y*
54.01%
5Y*
10Y*

ESP0.DE

1D
0.78%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-15.26%
6M
-16.25%
1Y
-12.68%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HNSS.L
HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF
84.37%45.50%19.96%32.89%-25.65%
ESP0.DE
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF
-15.26%19.17%50.92%26.26%-18.59%

Correlation

The correlation between HNSS.L and ESP0.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2022

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between HNSS.L and ESP0.DE has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNSS.L
HNSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
HNSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ESP0.DE
ESP0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESP0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HNSS.LESP0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

0.89

+0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

-0.45

+6.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.75

-0.79

+15.54

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the ESP0.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNSS.L and ESP0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNSS.L drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, which is greater than ESP0.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNSS.L and ESP0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNSS.LESP0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.32%

-39.26%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.74%

-27.09%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.83%

-27.09%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-26.52%

+20.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-13.54%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.50%

15.55%

-4.05%

Volatility

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) has a higher volatility of 13.65% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) at 4.22%. This indicates that HNSS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESP0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNSS.LESP0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.65%

4.22%

+9.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.17%

13.15%

+13.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.01%

16.84%

+37.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.29%

22.25%

+16.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.29%

23.26%

+15.03%

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNSS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ESP0.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HNSS.L vs. ESP0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HNSS.L nor ESP0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HNSS.L and ESP0.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HNSS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HNSS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESP0.DE.

HNSS.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while ESP0.DE is Technology Equities. HNSS.L tracks Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index, while ESP0.DE tracks MarketVector Global Video Gaming and eSports ESG. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HNSS.L and 0.55% for ESP0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNSS.L and ESP0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer