PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (HNDX.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HNDX.DE is traded in EUR, while ANAU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANAU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNDX.DE achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than ANAU.DE's 3.00% return.


HNDX.DE

1D
1.36%
1M
-3.09%
6M
16.12%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
26.80%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
18.84%

ANAU.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
4.06%
YTD
3.00%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HNDX.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
14.79%17.83%24.11%11.07%
ANAU.DE
AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc
3.00%6.81%34.15%11.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HNDX.DE and ANAU.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023

0.78

The correlation between HNDX.DE and ANAU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNDX.DE
HNDX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HNDX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNDX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNDX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HNDX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNDX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAU.DE
ANAU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (HNDX.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HNDX.DEANAU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

0.37

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

0.99

+6.33

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNDX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNDX.DE and ANAU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNDX.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.18%, which is greater than ANAU.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNDX.DE and ANAU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNDX.DEANAU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.18%

-26.00%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-10.15%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-0.54%

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-4.45%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

2.49%

+1.16%

Volatility

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (HNDX.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) at 1.53%. This indicates that HNDX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANAU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNDX.DEANAU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

1.53%

+7.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

6.71%

+8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

16.92%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

19.18%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

19.18%

+1.03%

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNDX.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ANAU.DE's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

HNDX.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HNDX.DE nor ANAU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HNDX.DE and ANAU.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANAU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HNDX.DE.

HNDX.DE tracks Nasdaq-100 Index (EUR Hedged), while ANAU.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HNDX.DE and 0.14% for ANAU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNDX.DE and ANAU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer