PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNDDX vs. FALAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HNDDX vs. FALAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Active Dividend Fund (HNDDX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HNDDX

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.91%
YTD
10.57%
6M
10.35%
1Y
27.31%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*

FALAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNDDX vs. FALAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HNDDX
Horizon Active Dividend Fund
10.57%18.89%21.66%6.24%-6.91%20.42%-3.24%17.20%-8.46%22.95%
FALAX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A
0.00%19.36%26.05%23.16%-8.16%25.49%8.56%31.37%-8.64%15.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HNDDX and FALAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between HNDDX and FALAX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HNDDX vs. FALAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNDDX
HNDDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HNDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HNDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FALAX
FALAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNDDX vs. FALAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Active Dividend Fund (HNDDX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HNDDXFALAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.46

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

2.70

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.12

4.58

+13.54

HNDDX vs. FALAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNDDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the FALAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNDDX and FALAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HNDDXFALAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

1.70

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.75

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.46

+0.16

Drawdowns

HNDDX vs. FALAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNDDX drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, smaller than the maximum FALAX drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNDDX and FALAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNDDXFALAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.28%

-63.41%

+27.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-5.05%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-18.92%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-21.62%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-4.19%

+3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-13.96%

+9.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

2.81%

-1.29%

Volatility

HNDDX vs. FALAX - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Active Dividend Fund (HNDDX) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that HNDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNDDXFALAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

0.00%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

4.10%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.05%

8.05%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

16.44%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

18.58%

-2.72%

HNDDX vs. FALAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNDDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FALAX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

HNDDX vs. FALAX - Dividend Comparison

HNDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than FALAX's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALAX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A
6.03%6.03%6.33%3.46%2.21%6.69%5.50%8.65%17.32%6.41%2.11%3.02%
HNDDX
Horizon Active Dividend Fund
6.26%6.55%6.25%1.54%2.17%3.98%2.13%2.67%5.86%2.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HNDDX and FALAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HNDDX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to FALAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNDDX dropped -36.28% vs FALAX's -63.41%.

HNDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNDDX and FALAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer