PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HMXJ.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - HMXJ.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while XCX5.L tracks the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMXJ.L returned 8.45%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for XCX5.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMXJ.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.

Performance

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMXJ.L achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, HMXJ.L has outperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 8.45%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.

HMXJ.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.55%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.65%
1Y
17.57%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
8.45%

XCX5.L

1D
1.26%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-12.70%
6M
-12.76%
1Y
-12.07%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
7.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMXJ.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF		8.91%12.37%6.43%0.38%5.35%5.41%3.21%13.89%-5.45%14.45%
XCX5.L
Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C		-12.70%-5.16%11.92%12.56%2.33%26.19%9.49%2.58%-3.56%24.83%

Correlation

The correlation between HMXJ.L and XCX5.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.45

The correlation between HMXJ.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HMXJ.L
XCX5.L

Financial Services

45.1%
28.3%

Basic Materials

16.1%
8.5%

Industrials

8.5%
10.2%

Real Estate

7.8%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
12.4%

Utilities

3.5%
4.5%

Healthcare

3.3%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.2%

Energy

2.7%
9.5%

Communication Services

2.6%
4.7%

Technology

1.0%
8.2%

Financial Services

HMXJ.L
45.1%
XCX5.L
28.3%

Basic Materials

HMXJ.L
16.1%
XCX5.L
8.5%

Industrials

HMXJ.L
8.5%
XCX5.L
10.2%

Real Estate

HMXJ.L
7.8%
XCX5.L
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HMXJ.L
6.3%
XCX5.L
12.4%

Utilities

HMXJ.L
3.5%
XCX5.L
4.5%

Healthcare

HMXJ.L
3.3%
XCX5.L
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

HMXJ.L
3.0%
XCX5.L
6.2%

Energy

HMXJ.L
2.7%
XCX5.L
9.5%

Communication Services

HMXJ.L
2.6%
XCX5.L
4.7%

Technology

HMXJ.L
1.0%
XCX5.L
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF

Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with HMXJ.L:
HMXJ.L vs. VAPX.LHMXJ.L vs. ISF.LHMXJ.L vs. EMIM.LHMXJ.L vs. PAXJ.LHMXJ.L vs. AASG.LHMXJ.L vs. LDAG.LHMXJ.L vs. ASDV.L
Often compared with XCX5.L:
XCX5.L vs. INDAXCX5.L vs. FRIN.LXCX5.L vs. FLINXCX5.L vs. XMMS.LXCX5.L vs. CEA1.LXCX5.L vs. QQQXCX5.L vs. SPX5.L

Return for Risk

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HMXJ.L
HMXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HMXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
XCX5.L
XCX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HMXJ.LXCX5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.61
-0.76

+2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.40
-1.01

+3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.89

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

-0.60

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

-1.37

+8.73

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMXJ.L and XCX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HMXJ.LXCX5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

-0.76

+2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.26

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.37

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.23

+0.19

Drawdowns

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, smaller than the maximum XCX5.L drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMXJ.L and XCX5.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HMXJ.LXCX5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.30%

-41.74%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-19.88%

+12.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-26.47%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

-26.47%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.30%

-37.35%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-23.06%

+20.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-11.04%

+4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

8.81%

-6.43%

Volatility

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) is 3.58%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that HMXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HMXJ.LXCX5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

6.39%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

13.26%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

15.78%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

15.92%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

19.89%

-3.77%

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMXJ.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMXJ.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison

HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while XCX5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMXJ.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF		3.02%3.43%3.80%4.13%3.79%2.71%3.05%3.88%3.80%3.23%3.32%4.03%
XCX5.L
Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HMXJ.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMXJ.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.

HMXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HMXJ.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMXJ.L and XCX5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer