HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L
HMXJ.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) and HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from HSBC - HMXJ.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while HTWN.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMXJ.L returned 8.13%/yr vs 22.71%/yr for HTWN.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMXJ.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWN.L.
Performance
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMXJ.L achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly lower than HTWN.L's 68.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HMXJ.L has underperformed HTWN.L with an annualized return of 8.13%, while HTWN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.71% annualized return.
HMXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
HTWN.L
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 68.07%
- 6M
- 72.32%
- 1Y
- 105.22%
- 3Y*
- 41.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.71%
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 8.31% | 12.37% | 6.43% | 0.38% | 5.35% | 5.41% | 3.21% | 13.92% | -5.45% | 14.45% |
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 68.07% | 23.15% | 27.50% | 21.97% | -21.03% | 29.44% | 32.11% | 29.37% | -3.48% | 16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMXJ.L and HTWN.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011 | 0.65 |
The correlation between HMXJ.L and HTWN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Basic Materials
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Industrials
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Real Estate
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Utilities
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
-
Healthcare
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Consumer Defensive
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Energy
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
-
Communication Services
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Technology
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMXJ.L
HTWN.L
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMXJ.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.69 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 11.81 | -9.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 30.73 | -24.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, roughly equal to the maximum HTWN.L drawdown of -32.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMXJ.L and HTWN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMXJ.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -32.63% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -8.86% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.47% | -29.76% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -29.98% | +12.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.30% | -29.98% | -2.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -6.96% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -7.43% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 3.41% | -0.89% |
Volatility
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) is 3.94%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that HMXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMXJ.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 10.84% | -6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 20.32% | -11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 24.31% | -13.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 21.13% | -7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 20.36% | -4.64% |
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMXJ.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWN.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMXJ.L vs. HTWN.L - Dividend Comparison
HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than HTWN.L's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 3.04% | 3.43% | 3.80% | 4.13% | 3.79% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 4.03% |
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 0.96% | 1.61% | 1.17% | 2.79% | 3.06% | 1.11% | 1.79% | 2.13% | 2.56% | 2.03% | 2.32% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMXJ.L and HTWN.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMXJ.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWN.L.
HMXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HMXJ.L and 0.50% for HTWN.L.
Find the right allocation for HMXJ.L and HTWN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer