PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMVYX vs. NQVRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMVYX vs. NQVRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford MidCap Value Fund (HMVYX) and Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HMVYX having a 13.82% return and NQVRX slightly higher at 14.44%. Over the past 10 years, HMVYX has underperformed NQVRX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while NQVRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.72% annualized return.


HMVYX

1D
-1.02%
1M
3.76%
YTD
13.82%
6M
11.87%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
10.39%

NQVRX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.86%
YTD
14.44%
6M
13.30%
1Y
30.69%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
13.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMVYX vs. NQVRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMVYX
Hartford MidCap Value Fund
13.82%4.58%10.25%16.17%-7.77%28.41%0.51%33.72%-14.61%13.37%
NQVRX
Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund
14.44%17.89%19.25%15.94%-1.02%28.56%-0.27%30.35%-14.39%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HMVYX and NQVRX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2001

0.92

The correlation between HMVYX and NQVRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMVYX vs. NQVRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMVYX
HMVYX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HMVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HMVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

NQVRX
NQVRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NQVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NQVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMVYX vs. NQVRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford MidCap Value Fund (HMVYX) and Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HMVYXNQVRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

4.37

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.24

16.54

-8.29

HMVYX vs. NQVRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMVYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the NQVRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMVYX and NQVRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HMVYX vs. NQVRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMVYX drawdown since its inception was -62.75%, smaller than the maximum NQVRX drawdown of -67.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMVYX and NQVRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMVYXNQVRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.75%

-67.80%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-7.37%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.52%

-17.93%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-17.93%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.47%

-42.26%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.55%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-10.97%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.94%

+0.62%

Volatility

HMVYX vs. NQVRX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford MidCap Value Fund (HMVYX) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX) at 4.20%. This indicates that HMVYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQVRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMVYXNQVRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.20%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

10.25%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.78%

13.33%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

16.26%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

19.04%

+1.56%

HMVYX vs. NQVRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMVYX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than NQVRX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMVYX vs. NQVRX - Dividend Comparison

HMVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than NQVRX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMVYX
Hartford MidCap Value Fund
3.77%4.30%11.36%6.44%10.05%6.82%0.57%5.05%12.94%2.53%7.04%8.09%
NQVRX
Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund
1.63%1.87%1.86%1.29%1.42%1.23%3.40%1.34%0.00%1.99%1.02%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMVYX and NQVRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HMVYX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to NQVRX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMVYX dropped -62.75% vs NQVRX's -67.80%.

NQVRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMVYX and NQVRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer