PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMVYX vs. FRNKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMVYX vs. FRNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford MidCap Value Fund (HMVYX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMVYX achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than FRNKX's 9.89% return. Over the past 10 years, HMVYX has outperformed FRNKX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while FRNKX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.


HMVYX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.76%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.09%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
9.78%

FRNKX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
9.89%
6M
9.60%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
7.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMVYX vs. FRNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMVYX
Hartford MidCap Value Fund
12.10%4.58%10.25%16.17%-7.77%28.41%0.51%33.72%-14.61%13.37%
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
9.89%12.05%19.31%14.88%4.23%6.46%12.84%4.15%-2.24%-2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HMVYX and FRNKX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2004

0.78

The correlation between HMVYX and FRNKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (10 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMVYX vs. FRNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMVYX
HMVYX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HMVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HMVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNKX
FRNKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FRNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMVYX vs. FRNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford MidCap Value Fund (HMVYX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMVYXFRNKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.37

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

6.08

+2.09

HMVYX vs. FRNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMVYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the FRNKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMVYX and FRNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMVYXFRNKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.11

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.01

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.01

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.01

+0.42

Drawdowns

HMVYX vs. FRNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMVYX drawdown since its inception was -62.75%, smaller than the maximum FRNKX drawdown of -97.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMVYX and FRNKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMVYXFRNKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.75%

-97.09%

+34.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-6.95%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.52%

-97.09%

+74.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-97.09%

+74.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.47%

-97.09%

+52.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-95.88%

+95.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-12.03%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.71%

-0.15%

Volatility

HMVYX vs. FRNKX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford MidCap Value Fund (HMVYX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) at 3.96%. This indicates that HMVYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMVYXFRNKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.96%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

10.53%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

14.91%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

1,805.06%

-1,786.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

1,276.35%

-1,255.71%

HMVYX vs. FRNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMVYX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNKX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMVYX vs. FRNKX - Dividend Comparison

HMVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than FRNKX's 10.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
10.90%11.98%4.63%10.14%8.10%4.93%0.00%0.23%3.23%0.00%3.00%7.64%
HMVYX
Hartford MidCap Value Fund
3.83%4.30%11.36%6.44%10.05%6.82%0.57%5.05%12.94%2.53%7.04%8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMVYX and FRNKX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HMVYX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FRNKX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMVYX dropped -62.75% vs FRNKX's -97.09%.

HMVYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMVYX and FRNKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer