PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HMUD.L is traded in USD, while FLXU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMUD.L achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than FLXU.L's 10.42% return.


HMUD.L

1D
-1.29%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
6.78%
6M
6.65%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
14.64%

FLXU.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
10.42%
6M
9.87%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
6.78%13.89%25.05%27.48%-20.22%27.36%20.72%30.46%-5.71%9.95%
FLXU.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
10.42%21.65%10.63%14.23%-8.73%27.41%8.93%29.31%-3.89%11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HMUD.L and FLXU.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017

0.78

The correlation between HMUD.L and FLXU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMUD.L
HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXU.L
FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HMUD.LFLXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.87

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

12.73

-1.13

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMUD.L and FLXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXU.L drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMUD.L and FLXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMUD.LFLXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-33.00%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-8.55%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.48%

-19.48%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.49%

-19.48%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-1.90%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-4.00%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.93%

-0.06%

Volatility

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) is 3.26%, while Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that HMUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMUD.LFLXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.96%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

9.76%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

12.37%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

14.19%

+1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

15.85%

+0.48%

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMUD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Dividend Comparison

HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while FLXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXU.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.93%0.95%0.82%0.97%1.07%0.78%1.11%1.22%1.45%1.24%1.43%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMUD.L and FLXU.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMUD.L and 0.25% for FLXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMUD.L and FLXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer