PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMSIX vs. MDST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HMSIX vs. MDST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HMSIX vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HMSIX
Hennessy Midstream Fund
17.65%-0.49%17.52%
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
11.80%7.09%17.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMSIX achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly higher than MDST's 11.80% return.


HMSIX

1D
-0.63%
1M
4.11%
YTD
17.65%
6M
18.55%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*

MDST

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.13%
YTD
11.80%
6M
12.54%
1Y
13.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HMSIX vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMSIX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HMSIX vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMSIX
HMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

MDST
MDST Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MDST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDST Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MDST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDST Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMSIX vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMSIXMDSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

0.79

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.67

1.07

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.19

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

0.97

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.94

3.74

-2.81

HMSIX vs. MDST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the MDST Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMSIX and MDST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMSIXMDSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.79

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.16

-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between HMSIX and MDST is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HMSIX vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison

HMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, less than MDST's 9.44% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HMSIX
Hennessy Midstream Fund
7.29%8.42%7.74%9.70%10.84%12.61%15.17%9.10%4.67%
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
9.44%10.22%6.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HMSIX vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMSIX drawdown since its inception was -68.43%, which is greater than MDST's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSIX and MDST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HMSIXMDSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.43%

-14.19%

-54.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-14.19%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.84%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-2.18%

-10.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

3.68%

+5.39%

Volatility

HMSIX vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST) at 2.15%. This indicates that HMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HMSIXMDSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

2.15%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

7.62%

+2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.24%

17.38%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

16.23%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.62%

16.23%

+13.39%