HMSIX vs. HFLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX).
HMSIX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013. HFLGX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Mar 20, 2009.
Performance
HMSIX vs. HFLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HMSIX vs. HFLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMSIX Hennessy Midstream Fund | 17.65% | -0.49% | 36.21% | 23.75% | 29.15% | 36.58% | -31.00% | 11.97% | -20.24% |
HFLGX Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.18% | 7.40% | 4.38% | 21.74% | -13.23% | 34.89% | 5.49% | 27.53% | -14.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMSIX achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly higher than HFLGX's 3.18% return.
HMSIX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 24.54%
- 5Y*
- 24.09%
- 10Y*
- —
HFLGX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HMSIX vs. HFLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMSIX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than HFLGX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HMSIX vs. HFLGX — Risk / Return Rank
HMSIX
HFLGX
HMSIX vs. HFLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMSIX | HFLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 0.79 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 1.22 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 0.93 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 4.05 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMSIX | HFLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.79 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.39 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.74 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between HMSIX and HFLGX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HMSIX vs. HFLGX - Dividend Comparison
HMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than HFLGX's 5.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMSIX Hennessy Midstream Fund | 7.29% | 8.42% | 7.74% | 9.70% | 10.84% | 12.61% | 15.17% | 9.10% | 4.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HFLGX Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund | 5.88% | 6.07% | 4.44% | 3.74% | 19.36% | 14.30% | 5.26% | 2.43% | 26.78% | 4.11% | 7.15% | 30.08% |
Drawdowns
HMSIX vs. HFLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMSIX drawdown since its inception was -68.43%, which is greater than HFLGX's maximum drawdown of -38.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSIX and HFLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMSIX | HFLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.43% | -38.90% | -29.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -12.01% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.17% | -25.67% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -6.86% | +5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.47% | -4.90% | -7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.07% | 2.77% | +6.30% |
Volatility
HMSIX vs. HFLGX - Volatility Comparison
Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX) at 3.11%. This indicates that HMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HMSIX | HFLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 3.11% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 8.56% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.24% | 16.19% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.15% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.62% | 18.88% | +10.74% |