PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HMSB.DE) and Adidas AG (ADS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMSB.DE achieves a -11.83% return, which is significantly lower than ADS.DE's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, HMSB.DE has underperformed ADS.DE with an annualized return of -5.34%, while ADS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.22% annualized return.


HMSB.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-11.83%
6M
-7.90%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
-5.77%
10Y*
-5.34%

ADS.DE

1D
-0.65%
1M
14.66%
YTD
-3.25%
6M
1.18%
1Y
-23.60%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
-10.60%
10Y*
4.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMSB.DE
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
-11.83%33.30%-18.54%57.08%-40.60%0.32%-6.01%50.22%-28.61%-34.23%
ADS.DE
Adidas AG
-3.25%-27.95%28.98%45.09%-48.72%-14.11%2.80%61.04%10.63%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HMSB.DE and ADS.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 1998

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMSB.DE
HMSB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HMSB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMSB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMSB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HMSB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMSB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ADS.DE
ADS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ADS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ADS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HMSB.DE) and Adidas AG (ADS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMSB.DEADS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.89

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

-0.61

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

-0.98

+3.90

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMSB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the ADS.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMSB.DE and ADS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMSB.DEADS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

-0.71

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.30

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

0.13

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.34

-0.33

Drawdowns

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMSB.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.71%, which is greater than ADS.DE's maximum drawdown of -71.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSB.DE and ADS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMSB.DEADS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.71%

-71.54%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.47%

-38.71%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.31%

-49.81%

+14.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.89%

-71.54%

+15.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.08%

-71.54%

+2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.79%

-49.63%

-10.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-24.40%

-13.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

24.02%

-16.49%

Volatility

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE - Volatility Comparison

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HMSB.DE) and Adidas AG (ADS.DE) have volatilities of 8.84% and 9.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMSB.DEADS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

9.26%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.48%

23.43%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.85%

33.20%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.97%

34.60%

+11.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.97%

32.33%

+12.64%

Dividends

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE - Dividend Comparison

HMSB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than ADS.DE's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADS.DE
Adidas AG
1.74%1.18%0.30%0.38%2.59%1.18%0.00%1.16%1.43%1.20%1.07%1.67%
HMSB.DE
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
0.38%0.33%0.39%0.32%0.54%0.35%0.00%0.45%0.70%0.53%0.36%0.29%

Financials

HMSB.DE vs. ADS.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) and Adidas AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HMSB.DE and ADS.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMSB.DE and ADS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer