ADS.DE vs. AMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Adidas AG (ADS.DE) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ADS.DE or AMAT.
Key characteristics
| ADS.DE | AMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.63% | 22.32% |
| 1Y Return | 43.59% | 76.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.71% | 15.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.23% | 36.63% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.62% | 28.19% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.08 | 2.28 |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.24% | 34.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -71.54% | -85.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -31.86% | -7.08% |
Fundamentals
| ADS.DE | AMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | €41.23B | $168.99B |
| EPS | -€0.67 | $8.50 |
| PE Ratio | 138.95 | 23.93 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.60 | 2.48 |
| Revenue (TTM) | €21.43B | $26.49B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | €10.69B | $11.99B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | €785.00M | $8.14B |
Correlation
The correlation between ADS.DE and AMAT is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ADS.DE having a 21.63% return and AMAT slightly higher at 22.32%. Over the past 10 years, ADS.DE has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 12.62%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 28.19% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adidas AG (ADS.DE) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
ADS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than AMAT's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADS.DE Adidas AG | 0.31% | 0.38% | 2.59% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 2.60% | 1.46% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.65% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADS.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.54%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADS.DE and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
Adidas AG (ADS.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 9.93%. This indicates that ADS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adidas AG and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities