ADS.DE vs. AMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Adidas AG (ADS.DE) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ADS.DE or AMAT.
Correlation
The correlation between ADS.DE and AMAT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ADS.DE:
-0.20
AMAT:
-0.51
ADS.DE:
-0.09
AMAT:
-0.48
ADS.DE:
0.99
AMAT:
0.94
ADS.DE:
-0.14
AMAT:
-0.49
ADS.DE:
-0.64
AMAT:
-0.87
ADS.DE:
9.65%
AMAT:
28.38%
ADS.DE:
29.64%
AMAT:
47.90%
ADS.DE:
-71.54%
AMAT:
-85.22%
ADS.DE:
-36.26%
AMAT:
-38.41%
Fundamentals
ADS.DE:
€36.01B
AMAT:
$125.61B
ADS.DE:
€4.25
AMAT:
$7.65
ADS.DE:
47.46
AMAT:
20.21
ADS.DE:
0.67
AMAT:
1.70
ADS.DE:
1.52
AMAT:
4.43
ADS.DE:
6.46
AMAT:
6.52
ADS.DE:
€24.38B
AMAT:
$20.99B
ADS.DE:
€12.43B
AMAT:
$10.04B
ADS.DE:
€2.53B
AMAT:
$6.48B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADS.DE achieves a -11.78% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's -3.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ADS.DE has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 11.84%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.46% annualized return.
ADS.DE
-11.78%
10.03%
-6.28%
-5.83%
0.81%
11.84%
AMAT
-3.86%
20.97%
-19.25%
-24.13%
24.95%
24.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ADS.DE vs. AMAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ADS.DE
AMAT
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adidas AG (ADS.DE) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
ADS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than AMAT's 1.03% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADS.DE Adidas AG | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 2.59% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 2.60% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 1.03% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADS.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.54%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADS.DE and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Adidas AG (ADS.DE) is 12.20%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 20.07%. This indicates that ADS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adidas AG and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADS.DE vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
ADS.DE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Adidas AG reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 6.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.50B and revenue of 7.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.
ADS.DE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Adidas AG reported an operating income of 610.00M and revenue of 6.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.18B and revenue of 7.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.
ADS.DE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Adidas AG reported a net income of 428.00M and revenue of 6.15B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 7.17B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.