PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMJP.L achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than HSPX.L's 10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, HMJP.L has underperformed HSPX.L with an annualized return of 10.30%, while HSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.


HMJP.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
6.17%
YTD
16.35%
6M
15.48%
1Y
33.99%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
10.30%

HSPX.L

1D
0.01%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.42%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
16.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMJP.L
HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD
16.35%17.44%9.05%14.01%-7.12%2.09%12.36%14.51%-8.64%13.37%
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.50%9.36%27.32%19.94%-9.10%30.95%13.89%26.37%0.09%10.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HMJP.L and HSPX.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2010

0.62

The correlation between HMJP.L and HSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HMJP.L
HSPX.L

Industrials

24.7%
7.8%

Technology

20.8%
38.0%

Financial Services

17.6%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
9.9%

Communication Services

8.8%
10.8%

Healthcare

5.8%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Utilities

1.0%
2.2%

Energy

1.0%
3.4%

Industrials

HMJP.L
24.7%
HSPX.L
7.8%

Technology

HMJP.L
20.8%
HSPX.L
38.0%

Financial Services

HMJP.L
17.6%
HSPX.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HMJP.L
12.0%
HSPX.L
9.9%

Communication Services

HMJP.L
8.8%
HSPX.L
10.8%

Healthcare

HMJP.L
5.8%
HSPX.L
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

HMJP.L
3.5%
HSPX.L
4.7%

Basic Materials

HMJP.L
2.9%
HSPX.L
1.7%

Real Estate

HMJP.L
1.9%
HSPX.L
1.9%

Utilities

HMJP.L
1.0%
HSPX.L
2.2%

Energy

HMJP.L
1.0%
HSPX.L
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMJP.L
HMJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HMJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HMJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

HSPX.L
HSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMJP.LHSPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.51

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

4.05

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

14.81

-4.66

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMJP.L and HSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMJP.LHSPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.72

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.05

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

1.04

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.97

-0.49

Drawdowns

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, roughly equal to the maximum HSPX.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMJP.L and HSPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMJP.LHSPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-25.43%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-7.16%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-20.76%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-20.76%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.24%

-25.43%

+1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.24%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-3.44%

-3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.96%

+1.38%

Volatility

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) at 2.66%. This indicates that HMJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMJP.LHSPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.66%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

7.23%

+7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

10.65%

+7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

14.22%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

15.47%

+0.54%

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMJP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

HMJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than HSPX.L's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMJP.L
HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD
1.49%1.74%1.64%1.75%1.98%1.53%1.68%1.83%1.73%1.41%1.27%1.10%
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.82%0.93%0.98%1.19%1.27%0.95%1.41%1.47%1.60%1.54%1.49%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMJP.L and HSPX.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for HMJP.L.

HMJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HSPX.L is S&P 500. HMJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HMJP.L and 0.09% for HSPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMJP.L and HSPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer