HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L
HMJP.L (HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD) and HSPX.L (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while HSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMJP.L returned 10.30%/yr vs 16.09%/yr for HSPX.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMJP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for HSPX.L.
Performance
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMJP.L achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than HSPX.L's 10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, HMJP.L has underperformed HSPX.L with an annualized return of 10.30%, while HSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.
HMJP.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 33.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
HSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMJP.L HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD | 16.35% | 17.44% | 9.05% | 14.01% | -7.12% | 2.09% | 12.36% | 14.51% | -8.64% | 13.37% |
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.50% | 9.36% | 27.32% | 19.94% | -9.10% | 30.95% | 13.89% | 26.37% | 0.09% | 10.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMJP.L and HSPX.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2010 | 0.62 |
The correlation between HMJP.L and HSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Technology
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Financial Services
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Communication Services
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Healthcare
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Basic Materials
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Real Estate
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Utilities
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Energy
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMJP.L
HSPX.L
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMJP.L | HSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.51 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 4.05 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.15 | 14.81 | -4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMJP.L | HSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.72 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.05 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.04 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.97 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, roughly equal to the maximum HSPX.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMJP.L and HSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMJP.L | HSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -25.43% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | -7.16% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -20.76% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -20.76% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.24% | -25.43% | +1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.24% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.98% | -3.44% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 1.96% | +1.38% |
Volatility
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) at 2.66%. This indicates that HMJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMJP.L | HSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 2.66% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | 7.23% | +7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 10.65% | +7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 14.22% | +1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 15.47% | +0.54% |
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMJP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HMJP.L vs. HSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
HMJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than HSPX.L's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMJP.L HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.64% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.53% | 1.68% | 1.83% | 1.73% | 1.41% | 1.27% | 1.10% |
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 0.95% | 1.41% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMJP.L and HSPX.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for HMJP.L.
HMJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HSPX.L is S&P 500. HMJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HMJP.L and 0.09% for HSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for HMJP.L and HSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer