PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMEZX vs. MRGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMEZX vs. MRGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund (HMEZX) and Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMEZX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than MRGR's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HMEZX has outperformed MRGR with an annualized return of 5.89%, while MRGR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.47% annualized return.


HMEZX

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.89%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
5.89%

MRGR

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.48%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMEZX vs. MRGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMEZX
NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund
1.72%6.30%7.42%4.10%2.70%5.37%8.46%8.10%5.92%5.48%
MRGR
Proshares Merger ETF
1.83%11.99%5.32%4.94%-4.81%6.58%1.99%4.31%3.42%2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HMEZX and MRGR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.20

The correlation between HMEZX and MRGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMEZX vs. MRGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMEZX
HMEZX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HMEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HMEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MRGR
MRGR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MRGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRGR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MRGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRGR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMEZX vs. MRGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund (HMEZX) and Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMEZXMRGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.19

1.56

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.25

8.65

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

58.26

23.71

+34.55

HMEZX vs. MRGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMEZX Sharpe Ratio is 4.56, which is higher than the MRGR Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMEZX and MRGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMEZXMRGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.56

2.72

+1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.92

1.05

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.56

0.68

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.36

+1.24

Drawdowns

HMEZX vs. MRGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMEZX drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum MRGR drawdown of -13.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEZX and MRGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMEZXMRGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-13.23%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.55%

-1.29%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.06%

-2.10%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.94%

-8.40%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.86%

-13.23%

+6.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.33%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-3.86%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.47%

-0.37%

Volatility

HMEZX vs. MRGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund (HMEZX) is 0.24%, while Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that HMEZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMEZXMRGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

1.08%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

2.95%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23%

4.11%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.68%

3.82%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

5.15%

-1.35%

HMEZX vs. MRGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMEZX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MRGR's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMEZX vs. MRGR - Dividend Comparison

HMEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than MRGR's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMEZX
NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund
5.02%5.04%6.36%5.07%5.11%3.63%5.83%0.33%19.16%6.88%0.02%0.00%
MRGR
Proshares Merger ETF
2.97%3.12%3.21%2.11%0.61%0.59%0.00%0.78%1.39%0.36%0.74%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMEZX and MRGR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRGR has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to HMEZX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMEZX dropped -6.86% vs MRGR's -13.23%.

HMEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMEZX and MRGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer