PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMDYX vs. SSMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMDYX vs. SSMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX) and SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMDYX achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly lower than SSMGX's 19.16% return. Over the past 10 years, HMDYX has underperformed SSMGX with an annualized return of 9.32%, while SSMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.80% annualized return.


HMDYX

1D
0.64%
1M
0.86%
YTD
7.92%
6M
5.86%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
9.32%

SSMGX

1D
0.41%
1M
0.47%
YTD
19.16%
6M
16.51%
1Y
33.68%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMDYX vs. SSMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMDYX
The Hartford MidCap Fund
7.92%-0.48%6.17%14.70%-24.01%9.89%25.10%38.80%-7.56%24.41%
SSMGX
SIT Small Cap Growth Fund
19.16%9.40%13.42%16.93%-25.59%15.80%35.97%29.19%-10.88%15.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HMDYX and SSMGX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1997

0.92

The correlation between HMDYX and SSMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMDYX vs. SSMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMDYX
HMDYX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HMDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
HMDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SSMGX
SSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMDYX vs. SSMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX) and SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HMDYXSSMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.31

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

3.33

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

12.34

-11.44

HMDYX vs. SSMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMDYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the SSMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMDYX and SSMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HMDYX vs. SSMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMDYX drawdown since its inception was -50.76%, smaller than the maximum SSMGX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMDYX and SSMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMDYXSSMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.76%

-65.75%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.91%

-10.05%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.77%

-26.67%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.92%

-34.37%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.98%

-35.72%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.36%

-1.84%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-19.01%

+10.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

2.71%

+2.63%

Volatility

HMDYX vs. SSMGX - Volatility Comparison

The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX) and SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) have volatilities of 6.85% and 6.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMDYXSSMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

6.94%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

14.83%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

18.85%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.82%

21.99%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

21.61%

-0.02%

HMDYX vs. SSMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMDYX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SSMGX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMDYX vs. SSMGX - Dividend Comparison

HMDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.21%, more than SSMGX's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMDYX
The Hartford MidCap Fund
17.21%18.58%4.80%1.73%7.40%10.29%9.17%8.60%11.42%3.95%2.61%7.05%
SSMGX
SIT Small Cap Growth Fund
4.60%5.48%4.69%3.13%1.73%15.89%3.44%3.14%9.80%6.81%0.17%10.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMDYX and SSMGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSMGX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to HMDYX (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMDYX dropped -50.76% vs SSMGX's -65.75%.

SSMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMDYX and SSMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer