HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L
HMCX.L (HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP) and HMUD.L (HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMCX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while HMUD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMCX.L returned 2.70%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for HMUD.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMCX.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HMUD.L.
Performance
HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMCX.L is traded in GBp, while HMUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMUD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMCX.L achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than HMUD.L's 9.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HMCX.L has underperformed HMUD.L with an annualized return of 2.70%, while HMUD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.
HMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
HMUD.L
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 5.73%
- YTD
- 9.40%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 23.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 15.45%
HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCX.L HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP | 4.02% | 8.36% | 3.93% | 4.54% | -19.69% | 13.90% | -7.19% | 25.24% | -15.88% | 14.31% |
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 9.40% | 5.78% | 27.24% | 21.09% | -10.74% | 28.57% | 17.17% | 25.51% | -0.13% | 11.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMCX.L and HMUD.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2010 | 0.53 |
The correlation between HMCX.L and HMUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMCX.L
HMUD.L
HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMCX.L | HMUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.37 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 3.41 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | 12.02 | -9.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMCX.L | HMUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 2.04 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.87 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.93 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.95 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than HMUD.L's maximum drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCX.L and HMUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMCX.L | HMUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -26.43% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -6.80% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -21.51% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.75% | -21.51% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.87% | -26.43% | -15.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | 0.00% | -5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -3.54% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.93% | +1.63% |
Volatility
HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that HMCX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMCX.L | HMUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 3.33% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 8.31% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 11.33% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 15.54% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 16.58% | -0.41% |
HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMCX.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HMUD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMCX.L vs. HMUD.L - Dividend Comparison
HMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than HMUD.L's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCX.L HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.91% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 1.22% | 1.45% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMCX.L and HMUD.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMUD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMUD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HMCX.L.
HMCX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while HMUD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. HMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HMCX.L and 0.30% for HMUD.L.
Find the right allocation for HMCX.L and HMUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer