PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMCNX vs. FTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMCNX vs. FTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMCNX achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than FTSIX's 14.98% return.


HMCNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.06%
YTD
13.22%
6M
13.51%
1Y
26.62%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*

FTSIX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.81%
YTD
14.98%
6M
14.76%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMCNX vs. FTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HMCNX
Harbor Mid Cap Fund
13.22%9.38%7.01%16.44%-17.46%24.12%18.45%3.52%
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
14.98%6.04%11.86%18.52%-17.63%25.29%19.19%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HMCNX and FTSIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.93

The correlation between HMCNX and FTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMCNX vs. FTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMCNX
HMCNX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HMCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSIX
FTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMCNX vs. FTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMCNXFTSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

4.12

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

11.88

-0.40

HMCNX vs. FTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMCNX and FTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMCNXFTSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.79

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.34

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Drawdowns

HMCNX vs. FTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMCNX drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, smaller than the maximum FTSIX drawdown of -42.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCNX and FTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMCNXFTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.10%

-42.12%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-6.80%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-23.30%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-27.57%

+3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

0.00%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-7.65%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.35%

-0.02%

Volatility

HMCNX vs. FTSIX - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) have volatilities of 3.96% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMCNXFTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

4.14%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

11.11%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

15.74%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

19.09%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

23.33%

-2.01%

HMCNX vs. FTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMCNX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSIX's 2.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMCNX vs. FTSIX - Dividend Comparison

HMCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than FTSIX's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
0.56%0.64%0.84%0.85%0.95%5.50%0.35%2.16%
HMCNX
Harbor Mid Cap Fund
2.21%2.50%0.27%1.94%2.93%1.79%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HMCNX and FTSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTSIX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to HMCNX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMCNX dropped -38.10% vs FTSIX's -42.12%.

HMCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMCNX and FTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer