HMC vs. MINT
HMC (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, HMC returned 3.34%/yr vs 2.71%/yr for MINT. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HMC vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMC achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, HMC has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 3.34%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.71% annualized return.
HMC
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 15.60%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -5.83%
- 1Y
- -2.84%
- 3Y*
- 0.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
HMC vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | -5.26% | 8.04% | -5.14% | 39.86% | -16.69% | 3.61% | 2.88% | 10.34% | -20.81% | 20.02% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.84% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMC and MINT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMC vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
HMC
MINT
HMC vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMC | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -65.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 20.57 | -19.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 94.51 | -94.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 941.34 | -941.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMC | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 17.12 | -17.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 6.00 | -6.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 2.88 | -2.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 2.47 | -2.30 |
Drawdowns
HMC vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMC drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMC and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMC | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -4.62% | -85.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.18% | -0.05% | -31.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.41% | -0.16% | -35.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.41% | -2.42% | -32.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | -4.62% | -38.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.35% | 0.00% | -20.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.10% | -0.17% | -35.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.31% | 0.00% | +15.31% |
Volatility
HMC vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that HMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMC | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 0.09% | +10.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.55% | 0.20% | +20.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.96% | 0.27% | +29.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.81% | 0.58% | +26.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 0.95% | +24.45% |
Dividends
HMC vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
HMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 2.44% | 4.67% | 3.19% | 3.29% | 4.00% | 3.08% | 2.72% | 2.90% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.87% | 2.86% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMC and MINT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HMC has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMC dropped -90.46% vs MINT's -4.62%.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.12 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HMC and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer