HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO
HMAX.TO (Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and USCL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HMAX.TO returned 35.28% vs 29.89% for USCL.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for USCL.TO.
Performance
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HMAX.TO having a 11.17% return and USCL.TO slightly higher at 11.57%.
HMAX.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 35.28%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCL.TO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 29.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 11.17% | 27.20% | 20.65% | 5.02% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.57% | 10.03% | 38.54% | 4.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMAX.TO and USCL.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between HMAX.TO and USCL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMAX.TO
USCL.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HMAX.TO
USCL.TO
Basic Materials
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Communication Services
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Consumer Defensive
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Energy
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Healthcare
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Industrials
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Real Estate
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Technology
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Utilities
HMAX.TO
-
USCL.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HMAX.TO
USCL.TO
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMAX.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.49 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | 3.51 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.27 | 14.29 | +6.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMAX.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.56 | 2.55 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 1.42 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum USCL.TO drawdown of -21.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMAX.TO and USCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMAX.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -21.85% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -8.56% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.08% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -2.55% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.10% | -0.44% |
Volatility
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) at 2.86%. This indicates that HMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMAX.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 2.86% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 9.31% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 11.79% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.42% | 15.44% | -4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.42% | 15.44% | -4.02% |
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than USCL.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMAX.TO vs. USCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
HMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.59%, less than USCL.TO's 11.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 11.59% | 12.29% | 14.08% | 15.47% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.95% | 12.94% | 11.57% | 7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMAX.TO and USCL.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USCL.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USCL.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HMAX.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HMAX.TO and 0.04% for USCL.TO.
Find the right allocation for HMAX.TO and USCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer